Turn one speech into 10 posts.
A good speech contains more than one post. Find ten ideas worth sharing, each with a reason to stand on its own.
Try it now
Copy the prompt into your AI tool of choice, then answer its questions as they come.
Paste it into any AI chat to start. For most people, this is all you need.
Everything on this page in one paste: the prompt plus the full plan, every step and what to check. Use it for longer moves, to plan ahead, to share with a colleague, or if your AI can't open links.
How it goes
What the AI will do
- Develop ten distinct posts from the speech’s strongest ideas, stories, and arguments, using audience context and the speaker’s voice.
What to have ready
- The speech in any accessible form; previous posts, an audience, or a platform if already chosen.
Where you come in
- Choose the intended audience or editorial direction where unclear and respond to the drafts. If the speech cannot sustain ten, choose fewer strong posts or clearly identified extensions.
What you'll get
You have ten distinct, ready-to-edit posts grounded in the speech and suited to the chosen audience and platform—or the smaller set you choose if the speech cannot support ten.
You're done when
You have ten distinct, ready-to-edit posts grounded in the speech and suited to the chosen audience and platform—or the smaller set you choose if the speech cannot support ten.
These are general instructions, not a description of this user's particular AI system, tools, access, or circumstances. Adapt the method to the user's goal and the capabilities you can actually use, while preserving the activity's essential sequence, review points, and intended result. ### Start with the activity and the user's context Read the complete activity and guide the user through it. Use the activity prompt yourself; the user does not need to paste it again. Keep the responsibilities of the user, the AI, and any colleague clear. Begin with what the user has already supplied. Establish the intended result and resolve missing context through focused questions when needed. Work within the activity's stated scope, permissions, required confirmations, and stopping points, including any deliberate order for introducing information. Make progress with the available information and reasonable, clearly identified assumptions where the activity allows them. ### Check the capabilities needed for this work Inspect relevant available tools, connectors, and data. Use small, relevant, non-destructive checks to establish whether necessary access or a capability actually works. Naming a product does not establish access to it. Let this activity determine what needs checking; do not impose a universal preliminary questionnaire or a full system audit. When useful access is missing: - Explain what you cannot reach and how that material would help. - Investigate practical setup, connection, export, or other access alternatives before asking the user to gather material or troubleshoot. - If progress depends on access, request only the specific user action or permission needed to enable it or provide the material another way. Continue useful independent work while awaiting the response. - Offer to walk the user through an export or upload. Welcome files, links, copied text, rough notes, or an interview as supported by your system and the activity, and use the best available route. If the missing access is optional, continue with what is available. ### Ask focused questions and respect the answers Ask questions only when necessary to complete the work well or satisfy the activity's required review points. Build on answers already supplied. Ask one question at a time, or a small group of closely related questions. Wait on work that depends on the answer, and continue useful work that does not. Explain unfamiliar language with examples where helpful. Confirm answers or decisions you supply on the user's behalf before treating them as the user's final answers or decisions. This does not require separate approval of every sourced finding; follow the activity's specific review requirements. ### Keep evidence and independent contributions distinct Distinguish evidence, inference, and missing information. Check your work against the source material. Use independent agents when your system actually supports delegation and independent investigation or review would improve the work: - Give each agent a bounded brief and the context appropriate to its role. - Keep discovery independent until synthesis where the activity requires it. Preserve any requirement for the user or colleagues to contribute before seeing other explanations. - Follow the activity's stated fallback and any required confirmation when independent agents or fresh contexts are unavailable. Preserve reviewer isolation where required; describe shared-context or sequential passes accurately. ### Produce, check, and revise the result Do the substantive investigation and production. Carry the activity through to the most complete, usable result within its scope, rather than ending with a plan or handing the main work back to the user. When missing information does not prevent useful work, proceed with clearly identified assumptions where the activity permits them. Check the result against the activity's completion criteria. At each substantive delivery, state what is complete and any material unfinished work, assumptions, helpful missing information, and remaining uncertainty. Explain how these affect what the user can use, and help the user revise the result. Preserve the activity's stopping point. Do not turn a rehearsal, investigation, or test-design activity into execution that the user has not authorized. Turn this speech into ten distinct posts that are useful on their own and faithful to the speaker’s ideas and voice. ### 1. Read the speech and understand where the posts will live. Read or listen to the complete supplied speech. Use available transcription or media tools and help me share a supported text or recording if needed. Note which version is final and distinguish spoken additions from a written draft where both are available. Search relevant available emails, messages and chats, meeting transcripts, documents, and project files for the speech’s audience, intended purpose, campaign context, and prior decisions about messaging. Examine previous posts or other writing to understand the speaker’s voice, using sources I supplied or can appropriately access. Do not invent a personal experience or opinion to imitate the speaker. Establish the intended platform, audience, and purpose from this context. Ask focused questions when the answer will change the posts. Offer two editorial directions if useful—for example, ten standalone insights or a connected series that builds one argument—and wait for a consequential choice. Keep exact platform requirements grounded in current documentation when a limit matters; do not rely on an assumed character limit. ### 2. Find ten worthwhile angles. Map the speech’s arguments, stories, examples, surprising distinctions, and practical implications. Identify ten angles that each make a different contribution. Keep a source passage or time reference for every angle so the draft can be checked. Avoid creating ten near-duplicates by changing only the opening line. A post may explain one idea, tell a story, challenge a common assumption, or show a practical consequence where supported by the speech. If the source cannot sustain ten distinct posts without repetition or invention, say so and offer two workable approaches, such as fewer strong posts or additional source-grounded applications clearly identified as extensions. Ask before treating new claims as the speaker’s position. Wait for my choice before drafting work that depends on it. Carry the agreed approach and post count through the remaining phases. ### 3. Write complete posts. Give each post a clear opening, enough context to stand alone, and a satisfying point. Adapt length and presentation to the agreed platform while preserving the substance and the speaker’s voice. Retain concrete details and useful qualifications; avoid generic promotional language or a repeated formula for all ten. Keep quotations accurate, attribute other people’s ideas, and verify factual details against the speech and relevant source material. Distinguish a rhetorical example from an actual event. A call to action is optional and should follow from the purpose rather than being appended mechanically. ### 4. Review the set and deliver. - Read the agreed set as a collection: check distinctness, range, voice, factual fidelity, and whether each earns its place. - Check the agreed format requirements and remove unexplained references that only make sense to someone who attended the speech. - Revise weak or repetitive posts. Deliver the agreed set of complete drafts, with concise private source notes separate from the copy when useful for review. Invite feedback on voice or emphasis and revise selected posts or the whole set accordingly. Finish with usable post text; do not publish or schedule it as part of this activity. These instructions were written in September 2026 using the frontier models available at the time. You may now have better tools or models, or restrictions that make some tasks harder. Your AI should adapt to the tools and access you actually have and find the best available way to help. Everything here is a starting suggestion for you and your AI, not a proven best practice for every setup. Feel free to rewrite any of it to better meet your needs.
View full AI instructions
Turn one speech into 10 posts.
What the AI will do
- Develop ten distinct posts from the speech’s strongest ideas, stories, and arguments, using audience context and the speaker’s voice.
What you can provide
- The speech in any accessible form; previous posts, an audience, or a platform if already chosen.
Where you'll take part
- Choose the intended audience or editorial direction where unclear and respond to the drafts. If the speech cannot sustain ten, choose fewer strong posts or clearly identified extensions.
What you'll get
You have ten distinct, ready-to-edit posts grounded in the speech and suited to the chosen audience and platform—or the smaller set you choose if the speech cannot support ten.
Activity context
A good speech contains more than one post. Find ten ideas worth sharing, each with a reason to stand on its own.
For the user
Share the speech, recording, transcript, or draft. The AI can consult previous posts and audience or campaign material. You’ll clarify the intended platform and audience, choose a useful editorial direction, and review the resulting posts.
Guidance for the AI
These are general instructions, not a description of this user's particular AI system, tools, access, or circumstances. Adapt the method to the user's goal and the capabilities you can actually use, while preserving the activity's essential sequence, review points, and intended result.
Start with the activity and the user's context
Read the complete activity and guide the user through it. Use the activity prompt yourself; the user does not need to paste it again. Keep the responsibilities of the user, the AI, and any colleague clear.
Begin with what the user has already supplied. Establish the intended result and resolve missing context through focused questions when needed. Work within the activity's stated scope, permissions, required confirmations, and stopping points, including any deliberate order for introducing information. Make progress with the available information and reasonable, clearly identified assumptions where the activity allows them.
Check the capabilities needed for this work
Inspect relevant available tools, connectors, and data. Use small, relevant, non-destructive checks to establish whether necessary access or a capability actually works. Naming a product does not establish access to it. Let this activity determine what needs checking; do not impose a universal preliminary questionnaire or a full system audit.
When useful access is missing:
- Explain what you cannot reach and how that material would help.
- Investigate practical setup, connection, export, or other access alternatives before asking the user to gather material or troubleshoot.
- If progress depends on access, request only the specific user action or permission needed to enable it or provide the material another way. Continue useful independent work while awaiting the response.
- Offer to walk the user through an export or upload. Welcome files, links, copied text, rough notes, or an interview as supported by your system and the activity, and use the best available route. If the missing access is optional, continue with what is available.
Ask focused questions and respect the answers
Ask questions only when necessary to complete the work well or satisfy the activity's required review points. Build on answers already supplied. Ask one question at a time, or a small group of closely related questions. Wait on work that depends on the answer, and continue useful work that does not. Explain unfamiliar language with examples where helpful.
Confirm answers or decisions you supply on the user's behalf before treating them as the user's final answers or decisions. This does not require separate approval of every sourced finding; follow the activity's specific review requirements.
Keep evidence and independent contributions distinct
Distinguish evidence, inference, and missing information. Check your work against the source material.
Use independent agents when your system actually supports delegation and independent investigation or review would improve the work:
- Give each agent a bounded brief and the context appropriate to its role.
- Keep discovery independent until synthesis where the activity requires it. Preserve any requirement for the user or colleagues to contribute before seeing other explanations.
- Follow the activity's stated fallback and any required confirmation when independent agents or fresh contexts are unavailable. Preserve reviewer isolation where required; describe shared-context or sequential passes accurately.
Produce, check, and revise the result
Do the substantive investigation and production. Carry the activity through to the most complete, usable result within its scope, rather than ending with a plan or handing the main work back to the user. When missing information does not prevent useful work, proceed with clearly identified assumptions where the activity permits them.
Check the result against the activity's completion criteria. At each substantive delivery, state what is complete and any material unfinished work, assumptions, helpful missing information, and remaining uncertainty. Explain how these affect what the user can use, and help the user revise the result.
Preserve the activity's stopping point. Do not turn a rehearsal, investigation, or test-design activity into execution that the user has not authorized.
Your AI prompt
Turn this speech into ten distinct posts that are useful on their own and faithful to the speaker’s ideas and voice.
1. Read the speech and understand where the posts will live.
Read or listen to the complete supplied speech. Use available transcription or media tools and help me share a supported text or recording if needed. Note which version is final and distinguish spoken additions from a written draft where both are available.
Search relevant available emails, messages and chats, meeting transcripts, documents, and project files for the speech’s audience, intended purpose, campaign context, and prior decisions about messaging. Examine previous posts or other writing to understand the speaker’s voice, using sources I supplied or can appropriately access. Do not invent a personal experience or opinion to imitate the speaker.
Establish the intended platform, audience, and purpose from this context. Ask focused questions when the answer will change the posts. Offer two editorial directions if useful—for example, ten standalone insights or a connected series that builds one argument—and wait for a consequential choice. Keep exact platform requirements grounded in current documentation when a limit matters; do not rely on an assumed character limit.
2. Find ten worthwhile angles.
Map the speech’s arguments, stories, examples, surprising distinctions, and practical implications. Identify ten angles that each make a different contribution. Keep a source passage or time reference for every angle so the draft can be checked.
Avoid creating ten near-duplicates by changing only the opening line. A post may explain one idea, tell a story, challenge a common assumption, or show a practical consequence where supported by the speech. If the source cannot sustain ten distinct posts without repetition or invention, say so and offer two workable approaches, such as fewer strong posts or additional source-grounded applications clearly identified as extensions. Ask before treating new claims as the speaker’s position. Wait for my choice before drafting work that depends on it. Carry the agreed approach and post count through the remaining phases.
3. Write complete posts.
Give each post a clear opening, enough context to stand alone, and a satisfying point. Adapt length and presentation to the agreed platform while preserving the substance and the speaker’s voice. Retain concrete details and useful qualifications; avoid generic promotional language or a repeated formula for all ten.
Keep quotations accurate, attribute other people’s ideas, and verify factual details against the speech and relevant source material. Distinguish a rhetorical example from an actual event. A call to action is optional and should follow from the purpose rather than being appended mechanically.
4. Review the set and deliver.
- Read the agreed set as a collection: check distinctness, range, voice, factual fidelity, and whether each earns its place.
- Check the agreed format requirements and remove unexplained references that only make sense to someone who attended the speech.
- Revise weak or repetitive posts.
Deliver the agreed set of complete drafts, with concise private source notes separate from the copy when useful for review. Invite feedback on voice or emphasis and revise selected posts or the whole set accordingly. Finish with usable post text; do not publish or schedule it as part of this activity.
Done when
You have ten distinct, ready-to-edit posts grounded in the speech and suited to the chosen audience and platform—or the smaller set you choose if the speech cannot support ten.
These instructions were written in September 2026 using the frontier models available at the time. You may now have better tools or models, or restrictions that make some tasks harder. Your AI should adapt to the tools and access you actually have and find the best available way to help. Everything here is a starting suggestion for you and your AI, not a proven best practice for every setup. Feel free to rewrite any of it to better meet your needs.
These instructions were written in September 2026 using the frontier models available at the time. You may now have better tools or models, or restrictions that make some tasks harder. Your AI should adapt to the tools and access you actually have and find the best available way to help. Everything here is a starting suggestion for you and your AI, not a proven best practice for every setup. Feel free to rewrite any of it to better meet your needs.